USPTO serial 99380664
H HIGH TIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUK, HAE P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with H HIGH TIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Skale
Andrew D. Skale Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.3580 Carmel Mountain RoadSuite 300San Diego, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Restaurant and bar services, including restaurant carryout services; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | Aug 29, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |