USPTO serial 99380744
ARGUS IT SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARGUS IT SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Worth, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben
Joshua M. Gerben Gerben Perrott, PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 500Washington, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Reseller services, namely, distributorship services in the field of computer equipment and hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Document destruction; Hard drive destruction services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of IT project management; IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Consultancy and information services relating to information technology architecture and infrastructure; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology (IT) systems of others; Technical support services, namely, migration of datacenter, server and database applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |