Drawing for ALIEN BRAIN DEFENSE

USPTO serial 99383100

ALIEN BRAIN DEFENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEICHTER, KENNETH HOWARD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 134

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALIEN BRAIN DEFENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ryan M. Kaiser

Ryan M. Kaiser AMIN WASSERMAN GURNANI, LLP230 W. Monroe St., Suite 1405Chicago, IL 60606United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 15, 2026ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 11, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 9, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance