USPTO serial 99384077
FORGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ONUOHA, ALEXANDRIA N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
Joseph V. Myers III Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree St. NESuite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable computer operating systems software for robots and aircraft; downloadable computer operating systems being downloadable software for autonomous operation of artificially intelligent agents, in particular robots, unmanned and manned aircraft; downloadable computer software for sharing of data between artificially intelligent robots; downloadable computer software for collecting, analyzing, sharing and learning from data by and between artificially intelligent robots; downloadable computer software for the storage, collection, analysis, review, exploration, transmission, querying, summarization, editing, hosting, collaboration, and sharing by and between humans and artificially intelligent robots and aircraft; computer operating systems comprised primarily of downloadable computer operating software, communication telemeters, video data transmission units, and downloadable software for automating flight control and aircraft function; Downloadable computer software for autonomous navigation of unmanned ground vehicles and unmanned surface and underwater vehicles; Downloadable and recorded operating software for autonomous vehicle control systems; Downloadable computer firmware for operating and managing sensors, navigation systems, and communications systems used in autonomous drones; Downloadable computer software for training, testing, and simulation of autonomous navigation and mission planning systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for autonomous control, mission planning, and performing data analytics in unmanned vehicles, for military, commercial, and industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |