Drawing for CROCO DICER

USPTO serial 99384746

CROCO DICER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROCO DICER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin L. Soules

Kevin L. Soules LOZA & LOZA, LLP305 N. Second Ave., #127Upland, CA 91786United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Non-electric food slicersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 10, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance