Drawing for SÚP NOODLE BAR

USPTO serial 99386497

SÚP NOODLE BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, TARYN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SÚP NOODLE BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vivek Vaidya

Vivek Vaidya Bend Law Group, PC2181 Greenwich St.San Francisco, CA 94123United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVEOct 20, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 29, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 10, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance