USPTO serial 99386859
ULTIMATE LININGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REAMS, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTIMATE LININGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie R. Fenstermaker
Julie R. Fenstermaker Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP127 Public Square, Suite 4900Cleveland, OH 44114United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Protective coatings in the nature of polyurethane and polyurea coatings for use on a wide variety of substrates; coatings in the nature of polyurethane and polyurea coatings to protect surfaces against corrosion and impact for use in automotive, boating, construction, manufacturing, commercial and industrial applications; concrete coatings, namely, concrete sealers in the form of a protective coatings for concrete; protective coatings for vehicles in the nature of top coatings for application to polymer surfaces, namely, spray-on truck bedliners; protective coatings for vehicles in the nature of spray-on polyurethane and polyurea coating to protect surfaces against corrosion and impact for use in the automobile and truck industry; exterior surface protective coatings in the nature of waterproof and protective coatings for patios and decks; waterproof and protective polyurethane and polyurea coatings for building foundations and basements; waterproof and protective polyurethane and polyurea coatings for concrete, metal, fiberglass and wood; none of the foregoing including house or trim paint | ACTIVE | Aug 16, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |