Drawing for COMPASS

USPTO serial 99388660

COMPASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eryn Y. Truong

Eryn Y. Truong Loza & Loza, LLP305 North Second Avenue, #127Upland, CA 91786United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing internal data, generating documents, and automating workflows; Downloadable computer programs using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing internal data, generating documents, and automating workflows; Downloadable virtual assistant software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing internal data, generating documents, and automating workflowsACTIVEMar 26, 2025

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 3, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance