USPTO serial 99392471
AGENTIC GENERAL LEDGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARRISON, EMMA BROOKE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AGENTIC GENERAL LEDGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane Henry Dreger
Duane Henry Dreger CESARI AND MCKENNA, LLPOne Liberty Square, Suite 310Boston, MA 02109United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) services featuring software for invoicing, bill pay, general ledger management, financial reporting, and real-time data analytics using artificial intelligence; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) services featuring software for invoicing, bill pay, general ledger management, financial reporting, and real-time data analytics using artificial intelligence; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for automating accounting processes and financial compliance. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |