USPTO serial 99394426
CREAMS INDULGE IN TOGETHERNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CREAMS INDULGE IN TOGETHERNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nyall Engfield
500 Westover Dr #12298Sanford, NC 27330United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services; Business management; Business administration; Providing office functions; Administration of the business affairs of franchises; Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; Business advisory services in the field of running of restaurants; Marketing services; Marketing research services in the field of restaurants; Business consulting services, namely, providing assistance in development of business strategies and creative ideation; Business management advisory services relating to franchising; Assistance in franchised commercial business management; Franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion; Franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurants and take-away food establishments | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing food and drink; Providing temporary accommodation; Cafe and restaurant services; Ice cream parlours; Providing food and drink in Internet cafes; Providing information about restaurant services; Restaurant services; Consultancy and advisory services relating to the provision of temporary accommodation; Coffee shops; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |