Drawing for CORETECH

USPTO serial 99395816

CORETECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 802
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERITZ, SARAH L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORETECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecil E. Key

Cecil E. Key Key Kesan Dallmann PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave., N.W.Suite 500Washington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for business process automationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
May 12, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 16, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance