Drawing for WIREX

USPTO serial 99398093

WIREX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANDER, DREW M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 131

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIREX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie R. Fenstermaker

Julie R. Fenstermaker Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP127 Public SquareSuite 4900Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Non-electric single strand wires, non-electric multi-strand wires, resistance wires, alloyed steel wires, aluminium wires, brass wires, copper wiresACTIVE—
007Non-electric wire reeling machines and wire coiling machinesACTIVE—
009Building power wire, electric cables and wires, electrical cables and wires, power wires and cablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 17, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance