USPTO serial 99401102
GOOD4U
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOPER, HUNTER JUDSON LOUIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with GOOD4U?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHERINE C. MILLER
CATHERINE C. MILLER HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Apple sauce; Apple cider vinegar; Pancake mixes; Cake mixes; Brownie mixes; Cookie mixes; Waffle mixes; Bread; Tortillas; Breakfast cereals; Chocolate; Chocolate truffles; Chocolate bars; Coffee; Coffee pods, filled; Mustard; Ketchup; Pasta; Dried pasta; Frozen pizza crusts; Frozen pizza dough; Frozen meals consisting primarily of grains; Frozen meals consisting primarily of rice; frozen meals consisting primarily of quinoa; Frozen pizza; Kombucha tea; Honey; Maple syrup; Gluten-free pasta; Pasta sauce; Tea based beverages; Sparkling tea; Tortilla chips; Popcorn; Sauces; Taco shells; Vinegar; Capers | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |