USPTO serial 99402200
TESTTRACK BY CALLREVU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUNDAR, SHERYL CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TESTTRACK BY CALLREVU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Towson, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Casavale
Christopher Casavale NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 South College St, Suite 2300IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for employee training for others in the automotive industry using artificial intelligence (AI); Downloadable software for employee training for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing job training in the field of the automotive industry for employees for others; Providing employment training in the field of the automotive industry for employees for others using artificial intelligence (AI) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for communications intelligence in the automotive industry; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for artificial intelligence (AI) for employee training for others in the automotive industry; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for employee training for others in the automotive industry; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for employee training for others in the automotive industry; Providing online non-downloadable virtual assistant software using artificial intelligence (AI) for employee training for others in the automotive industry; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in employee training for others using artificial intelligence (AI) in the automotive industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |