Drawing for MODELZOO

USPTO serial 99403702

MODELZOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODELZOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander JSW Johnson

Alexander JSW Johnson Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower Drive, Suite 610Troy, MI 48098United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for natural language, multiformat data, and multiformat media processing, generation, understanding, and analysis; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIaaS), namely, generative artificial intelligence models; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIaaS), namely, large language models; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIaaS), namely, artificial intelligence models for natural language, multiformat data, and multiformat media processing, generation, understanding, and analysis; Providing online non-downloadable artificial intelligence computer programs on data networks for natural language, multiformat data, and multiformat media processing, generation, understanding, and analysis; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring artificial intelligence software platforms for natural language, multiformat data, and multiformat media processing, generation, understanding, and analysis; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software platforms using artificial intelligence for natural language, multiformat data, and multiformat media processing, generation, understanding, and analysis; Software development; Software engineering; Software engineering services; Software customization serviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2026ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
May 6, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 20, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance