USPTO serial 99404105
FIGHT-TANK-FIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 692
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIGHT-TANK-FIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan Lee Johnson
Megan Lee Johnson Chasing Glass Law, PLLC19171 160th Avenue NEWoodinville, WA 98072United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Fueling of aircraft; Airplane maintenance and repair; Technical support services, namely, providing technical advice in the field of aircraft engine overhaul and repair; Repair, maintenance and modification of aircraft; Installation, maintenance and repair of aerial refueling systems and equipment for aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Air transport services; Air charter services; Air charter transportation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing training for certification in the field of aerial refeuling procedures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2026 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 13, 2026 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2026 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2026 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | PBPO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |