Drawing for RUTH

USPTO serial 99405123

RUTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOI, REBECCA EJ
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leland P Schermer

Leland P Schermer Marcus & Shapira LLPONE OXFORD CENTRE, 301 GRANT STREETPittsburgh, PA 15219United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Computer services, namely, providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of general interest, namely, Jewish lifecycle events via an on-line computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 22, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance