USPTO serial 99406242
AIRR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Harrison, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeromye V. Sartain
Jeromye V. Sartain MASTER KEY IP, LLP1113 Murfreesboro Road, Suite 106-514Franklin, TN 37064United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing, evaluating, and improving the representation of digital entities in generative AI outputs; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for analyzing, evaluating, and improving the representation of digital entities in generative AI outputs; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing, evaluating, and improving the representation of digital entities in generative AI outputs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing, evaluating, and improving the representation of digital entities in generative AI outputs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing, evaluating, and improving the representation of digital entities in generative AI outputs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence (AI) software for generating business analysis reports | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |