Drawing for SVCX

USPTO serial 99406270

SVCX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILMOE, MAUREEN H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SVCX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard W. Kline

Howard W. Kline Nath, Goldberg & Meyer112 S. West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting and information services; Business consulting services in the field of customer and employee surveys, marketing, and improving customer experience and customer services; Business consulting services in the field of metrics and feedback processes for comparing, rating the quality of, and improving the performance of products and services; Business consulting services in the field of customer and employee satisfaction and loyalty programs; Business consultation in the field of business leadership development; Business consulting services in the field of business process technology, organizational learning, change management, operational sustainability, and operations management; Business efficiency advice; Business management consultation in the field of executive and leadership development; Business management consulting services in the field of team development; Business management consulting and advisory servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 13, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 22, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance