USPTO serial 99408243
AMERICAN GLAMOUR BADGLEY MISCHKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, KATHERINE AILEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AMERICAN GLAMOUR BADGLEY MISCHKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Visser
Michelle L. Visser Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower Drive, Suite 610Troy, MI 48098United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | (Based on Use) handbags; purses; (Based on Intent to Use) All-purpose carrying bags; backpacks; duffel bags; tote bags; haversacks; bags for sports; backpacks for carrying infants; school bags; randsels in the nature of Japanese school satchels; wheeled shopping bags; bags for carrying pets; attaché cases; briefcases; pocket wallets; business card cases; credit card cases being wallets; key cases; conference folders in the nature of briefcase-type leather business folders; bags, envelopes and pouches of leather for packaging; travelling bags; leather travelling bag sets; suitcases; suitcases with wheels; trunks being luggage; toilet bags, not fitted, namely, unfitted toiletry bags, sold empty; vanity cases, not fitted; boxes of leather or leatherboard; umbrellas; harness for animals; leather leashes; muzzles; collars for animals; covers for animals; clothing for pets; walking sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on Use) footwear; footwear, namely, casual shoes, dress shoes; sandals; high-heeled shoes; (Based on Intent to Use) dresses; evening gowns; bridal gowns; skirts; tops as clothing; blouses; sweaters; shirts; polo shirts; T-shirts; sweatshirts; fleece tops; bodies, namely, bodices; bottoms as clothing; pants; jeans; leggings; shorts; outerwear, namely coats; coats; duffel coats; raincoats; anoraks; parkas; blazers; clothing jackets; body warmers, namely, warm up outfits; cloaks; ruanas; clothing wraps; furs being clothing; knitwear, namely cardigans, knitted scarves; suits; jumpsuits; hosiery; socks; tights; underwear; bras; boxer shorts; corsets being clothing; bustiers; sleepwear; pajamas; nightgowns; loungewear; athletic tops and athletic bottoms; bathrobes; shower caps; sports jackets; jogging pants; sports jerseys; swimwear; beachwear; pareos; neckwear; neckties; neckerchiefs; boas; scarves; mittens; beanies; ear muffs; gloves as clothing; braces for clothing; clothing belts; clothing made of leather and imitation leather, namely, belts, pants and chaps; headgear, namely, beanies, bonnets, head scarves; hats; caps being headwear; visors being headwear, headbands; berets; sneakers; ballet flats; footwear, namely slides; boots; athletic footwear; slippers; maternity clothing, namely dresses, tops, pants, underwear, bras; children and babies' clothing and footwear, namely, shirts, pants, boots, and shoes; plastic baby bibs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |