USPTO serial 99408967
INTELLIGENTAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOLANO, CARLITA JAYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with INTELLIGENTAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Britt L. Anderson
Britt L. Anderson Ashurst Perkins Coie US LLP3150 Porter Dr.Palo Alto, CA 94304United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for providing network, Internet, and computer security; downloadable software module used for scanning of electronic files, and detection and blocking of malware malicious code; downloadable software in the nature of an antivirus engine; downloadable computer software for management of computer network traffic; downloadable computer software used to provide reporting on computer network performance and activity; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence in the field of cybersecurity; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for use in scanning electronic files for potentially malicious content | ACTIVE | Aug 2, 2018 |
| 042 | Non-downloadable computer software as a service featuring software for providing network, Internet, and computer security; Providing on-line non-downloadable computer software used for scanning of electronic files, and detection and blocking of malware malicious code on a user's computer network; Providing on-line non-downloadable third party file scanning engine software; Providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for management of computer network traffic; non-downloadable software as a service featuring software for updating computer software virus definitions; online non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence in the field of cybersecurity; online non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for use in scanning electronic files for potentially malicious content | ACTIVE | Aug 2, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |