Drawing for STRONGHOLD

USPTO serial 99409229

STRONGHOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUNN, MADELINE R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRONGHOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laila S. Wolfgram

Laila S. Wolfgram Polsinelli PCPO Box 140310Kansas City, MO 64114-0310United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Fiber-reinforced adhesive sealant and caulking compound containing hardenable polymer resins, to be applied to carbon, glass and basalt fibers, then applied on concrete, masonry, steel and wood surfaces for the purposes of repairing, strengthening and reinforcing the concrete, masonry, steel and wood surface; fiber-reinforced polymer-based sealing compounds containing carbon, glass and basalt fibers, to be applied to concrete, masonry, steel and wood for the purposes of repair, strengthening and reinforcingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
May 11, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 23, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance