USPTO serial 99411171
STONEY ORCHARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAMSON, LEANNA JOYCE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STONEY ORCHARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Modesto, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMANDA R. CONLEY
AMANDA R. CONLEY CONLEY LAW, P.C.2601 Blanding AvenueSuite C-393Alameda, CA 94501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing a website featuring a blog and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles and newsletters in the field of cannabis, cannabis-infused edibles, cannabis culture, cannabis policy, and the cannabis industry; providing a website featuring entertainment information in the fields of cannabis, cannabis-infused edibles, and cannabis culture; providing a website featuring news and commentary in the field of entertainment relating to cannabis, cannabis-infused edibles, and cannabis culture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |