USPTO serial 99411401
SYNCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALIENDO, COURTNEY MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SYNCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia Wilczynski Brozek
Patricia Wilczynski Brozek WILCZYNSKI BROZEK LAW40 Preston StreetP.O. Box 1830Huntington, NY 11743Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Kapok, Cotton batting for futons, Cotton waddings for clothes, Feathers and downs, Eiderdown being feathers, Angora goat hair, Wool flock for stuffing, Raw wool, Down feathers for use as stuffing, Feathers for stuffing, Feathers for stuffing upholstery, Feathers for bedding, Semi-synthetic fibers for textile use, Polyester batting, Polyester stuffing fibers, Fiberfill, Polyester fibers for textile use, Plastic fibers for textile use, Synthetic fibers for textile use, Chemical fibers for textile use, Wadding for filtering, Wadding not of rubber, paper or plastic for padding and stuffing, Cotton wadding for use in quilts, Carded wool, Shorn wool, Fleece wool, Artificial hair for stuffing and padding purposes, wool flock for stuffing upholstery, artificial wools being synthetic wool fibers for textile use, regenerated fibers made of plant-based materials, polymeric materials and cellulose materials for textile use, regenerated fibers made of bio-fabricated materials for textile use, inorganic fibers being synthetic fibers for textile use, inorganic fibers being carbon fibers and glass fibers for textile use, cotton waste being cotton flock for padding and stuffing | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Upholstery fabrics; Decorative wall hangings of textile; Quilts of textile; Bed pads; Crib sheets; Quilts of eiderdown; Lap rugs; Sleeping bags; Mixed fiber fabrics; Chemical fiber base mixed fabrics; Regenerated fiber yarn fabrics; Textile used as lining for clothing; Non-woven textile fabrics; Felt and non-woven textile fabrics; Quilts; fabric valances; mattress protectors in the nature of mattress pads and mattress covers; hat linings being textile used as lining for clothing hats; linings being textiles used as linings for clothing; Synthetic fiber fabrics; inorganic fibers being carbon fiber fabrics for textile use; regenerated fiber yarn fabrics for textile use; fabrics made of regenerated fibers being regenerated fiber yarn fabrics for textile use; fabrics made of artificial wools for textile use; fabrics made of synthetic regenerated fibers for textile use | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale store services featuring mattresses; Wholesale store services featuring clothing; Wholesale store services featuring inorganic fibers for textile use; Wholesale store services featuring chemical fibers for textile use; Wholesale store services featuring raw cotton fibers; Retail store services featuring mattresses; Retail store services featuring clothing; Retail store services featuring inorganic fibers for textile use; Retail store services featuring chemical fibers for textile use; Retail store services featuring raw cotton fibers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |