USPTO serial 99411446
VEEVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEEVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RHETT V. BARNEY
RHETT V. BARNEY LEE & HAYES PC601 W RIVERSIDE AVE. SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for monitoring, tracking, and analyzing cardiovascular health data derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), cardiac CT scanning procedures, and blood-based cardiovascular biomarker testing, and providing information in the field of preventive cardiovascular disease management; all of the foregoing for use by individual patients in connection with personal preventive cardiovascular health management and screening | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for monitoring, tracking, and analyzing health data and providing information in the field of cardiometabolic health. | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing medical information in the field of cardiometabolic health; Providing personalized healthcare and medical information in the nature of health and wellness insights based on health data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |