USPTO serial 99412023
ORTHOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEEHY, CONNOR RYAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORTHOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARLIR AMADO
ARLIR AMADO KRAMER AMADO PC225 REINEKERS LANESUITE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Ingredients and extracts, namely, botanical extracts, other than essential oils, for use in the manufacture of dietary and nutritional supplements; Plant extracts, other than essential oils, for use in the manufacture of dietary and nutritional supplements; Vitamins for use in the manufacture of food supplements; Vitamins for manufacturing use | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Food supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PLT HEALTH SOLUTIONS - LAILA NUTRACEUTICALS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PLT HEALTH SOLUTIONS - LAILA NUTRACEUTICALS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ORTHOFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |