Drawing for INKO JAPANESE STEAKHOUSE

USPTO serial 99412146

INKO JAPANESE STEAKHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLLAND, JAMI ELENA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INKO JAPANESE STEAKHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zachary A. Aria

Zachary A. Aria Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services; Bar services; Cafe services; Catering services; Provision of food and drinkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jun 2, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance