USPTO serial 99412678
FRESKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHOEN,LINDSEY O
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Gardens, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrian Lores de la Pena
Adrian Lores de la Pena Lores Law PLLC dba The Miami Tax Lawyer10621 N Kendall DriveSte 214Miami, FL 33176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby wipes impregnated with cleaning preparations | ACTIVE | Aug 16, 2021 |
| 006 | Metal beverage cans | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Sunflower oil for food | ACTIVE | Aug 16, 2021 |
| 030 | Seasoning; Cocoa spreads | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 2021 |
| 032 | Powders for making soft drinks; Powders for making fruit-based drinks; Powders used in the preparation of soft drinks | ACTIVE | Aug 16, 2021 |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services featuring beverages, powders for making beverages, edible oils, seasonings, cocoa spreads, household cleaning preparations, and personal care products, namely, baby wipes, provided to retailers and commercial resellers; none of the foregoing services featuring kitchen appliances, cooking appliances, food preparation machines, or kitchen utensils. | ACTIVE | Aug 16, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRESKO PRODUCTS CORP
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named FRESKO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |