USPTO serial 99414209
ORION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OVERTON, ARIEL LEEANNA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen E. Kelly
Maureen E. Kelly Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLaw@vorysColumbus, OH 44312-2255Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring on-line non-downloadable software for the purpose of managing brands' seller relationships and policies and product distribution and sales through monitoring product listings on websites and ecommerce marketplaces and enforcing against violations by online sellers to help control brands' sales channels and protect against product diversion, reseller policy violations, counterfeiting, trademark infringements or violations of Brand Guidelines, and other illegal or disruptive activities that impact product sales, revenue and brand equity; Computer services, namely, providing an online, non-downloadable computer software application for monitoring product sales numbers, product suppression, buy box activity, product offers and sellers' associated sales revenue, and featured offers on ecommerce platforms and websites which also provides enforcement capabilities related to seller activity on ecommerce platforms and websites; Platform as a service featuring computer software platforms for monitoring product sales numbers, product suppression, buy box activity or position as a featured offer, product offers and sellers' associated sales revenue, featured offers on ecommerce platforms and websites, and which enable brand protection and enforcement capabilities related to seller activity on ecommerce platforms and websites; and Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring product offers and sales disruptions, analyzing sales metrics, organizing seller policies, and managing seller relationships, and communicating business metric analytics in the fields of online sales disruptions, seller relationship management, legal enforcement, brand protection and ecommerce; all of the above to be marketed and sold to brands that sell products on ecommerce websites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |