Drawing for BOOSTER

USPTO serial 99415002

BOOSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 651
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOOSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley M. Stohry

Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry Dean LLP6151 Central AveIndianapolis, IN 46220United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for use in asphalt and bitumen; Chemical additives for modifying asphalt and roofing materials in the nature of tar, bitumen, and pitchACTIVE—
019Asphalt; Asphalt paving compositions; Asphalt for use in roofing; Asphalt patching compounds made of a bitumen or tar baseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 4, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 26, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance