USPTO serial 99415274
ESTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, KAREINE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ESTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy E. Wolff
Nancy E. Wolff COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP60 Broad Street, 30th FloorNew York, NY 10004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing an online searchable database featuring non-downloadable videos, photographs, archival photographs, stock photographs, pictorial images, pictures of the built environment for entertainment purposes; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos, photographs, archival photographs, stock photographs, pictorial images, pictures of the built environment; Photographic imaging services; Photography services; Production consulting services, namely, consulting services in the field of book catalogue design and fabrication, architectural retouching, publishing and videos publishing of videos | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of architectural drawings, photographs, video and film of others; Product licensing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |