Drawing for EXAONE NEXUS

USPTO serial 99415422

EXAONE NEXUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 651
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXAONE NEXUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Minchul Yang

Minchul Yang STIP Law Group, LLC40 W. Chesapeake Ave, Suite 506Towson, MD 21204United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business risk assessment services related to licensing and personal information in artificial intelligence training data; Consulting in the field of database dataset management for developing artificial intelligence; Data processing services for verifying copyright and license conflicts in artificial intelligence training datasets; Business advisory services regarding the commercial use of generative artificial intelligence models; Business strategy development services for agent services utilizing artificial intelligence platforms; Business investigation into the regulatory compliance of datasets for training artificial intelligence; Business research and surveys on market demand and technology trends for artificial intelligence language models; Collection and systematization of data in a central file regarding the source and licensing information of artificial intelligence training datasets for business purposes; Providing business information relating to artificial intelligence models and applied technologiesACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable software for tracking and assessing legal risks in datasets for training artificial intelligence; Computer security threat analysis for data protection, namely, analyzing security threats in datasets for developing artificial intelligence; Data mining for detecting license conflicts and the inclusion of personal information in datasets; Computerized analysis of data for risk assessment and scoring of artificial intelligence training datasets; Software as a service (SaaS) for natural language processing, understanding, reasoning, and generation; Platform as a service (PaaS) for developing and operating artificial intelligence agents; Research in the field of artificial intelligence technology relating to generative artificial intelligence models capable of deep thinking and reasoning; Computer software development for building artificial intelligence models and data analysis systems; Computer software design and development of software for executing actions of artificial intelligence-based agents; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence to support the building of artificial intelligence ecosystems; IT security software development for security analysis and management of artificial intelligence training datasets; research in the field of artificial intelligence, namely analysis of the reasoning ability and performance of large-scale language modelsACTIVE—
045Analysis of legal risks in datasets for training artificial intelligenceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 13, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 15, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 26, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance