USPTO serial 99415715
AUREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COUGHLAN, REBECCA D.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntsville, AL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of wireless communication systems for transmission and reception of voice, data and video; engineering services; engineering research; non-land vehicles design services; engineering, scientific laboratory, technological consulting, and research and development services in the field of energy and energy transformation technology; engineering, scientific laboratory, technological consulting, and research and development services in the field of aerospace energy systems, namely, aerospace propulsion systems, aerospace projectile systems, and aerospace explosive systems; scientific and technological services, namely, scientific laboratory, research, product failure analysis, and aerospace mission testing services in the fields of energy technology, energy transformation technology, aerospace propulsion systems, aerospace projectile systems, and aerospace explosive systems; technology consultation and research in the field of aerospace engineering; technology consultation in the field of space, aerospace, and defense engineering; digital mission design, namely, Digital Mission Engineering; technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; technology consultation and research in the field of threat exploitation in the nature of cybersecurity and aerospace defense; design and development of spacecraft and launch systems in the field of aerospace launch systems that are deemed safe for human occupancy; technology consultation and research in the field of computer systems integration, modeling, simulation, and lifecycle planning; Message encryption for others; technology consultation and research in the field of advanced autonomy software, decision aids in the nature of analytical software, and aerospace threat detection software; Custom design of prototypes; technology consultation and research in the field of cyber security; design and development of spacecraft; design and development of launch systems in the field of aerospace launch systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |