USPTO serial 99416568
AZADI TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZULCH, CHRISTOPHER DRAKE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AZADI TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, AF
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kiranjit K Dharsan
Kiranjit K Dharsan Seiter IP1110 N Virgil Ave, Suite #98436Los Angeles, CA 90029United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network; Video on demand transmissions; Internet broadcasting services; Subscription television broadcasting services; Satellite transmission services, television and radio broadcasting services; Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet; Radio and television broadcasting services; Electronic transmission of information posted to usenet newsgroups and discussion groups via a global computer network; Electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; Telecommunications transmission of videocasts; Transmission of news; Transmission of sound, video and information; Transmission and distribution of data or audio visual images via a global computer network or the internet; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics and video by means of broadband, copper and optical or wireless networks; Transmission of news items to news reporting organizations; Satellite transmission of sounds, images, signals and data; Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; Electronic transmission of voice, data and images by television and video broadcasting; Broadcast transmission by satellite | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |