USPTO serial 99418220
GOGO SQUEEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKSHOOD, AKEELA MOHAMED
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with GOGO SQUEEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SURESNES, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Ciotola
Michelle P. Ciotola Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cakes; waffles; bread; cereal preparations, namely, breakfast cereals, processed cereals, cereal bars, cereal flour; gruel, with a milk base, for food, namely, oatmeal, porridge; fruit jelly candy; groats for human food; dessert mousses (confectionery); fruit coulis (sauces); pancakes (foodstuffs); cereal-based snacks; rice-based snack foods; pastry; cookies; nut and chocolate confectionery; chocolate; edible ices; rice cakes; semolina cakes; cereal-based desserts, namely, cereal cookies; rice pudding; custard; beverages based on cocoa, coffee, chocolate and tea; petits fours (cakes); frozen yogurt (confectionery ices); ice cream bars; confectionery products made with ice cream, namely, ice cream cakes, ice cream desserts; dessert cream in the nature of bavarian creams, pastry cream, ice creams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |