Drawing for DESIGNHAPPIER

USPTO serial 99418691

DESIGNHAPPIER

Status 645Office Action
Filing date
Oct 1, 2025
Status date
Aug 25, 2026
Registration date
Examiner
BURDECKI, ANNA C

Need help with DESIGNHAPPIER?

CopyMark Law Group can help you respond to USPTO correspondence, keep a registration alive, or watch new filings against your mark.

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Owner

  • Kyeann Sayer

    Albuquerque, NM, US

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009090696 downloadable image files I wrote the following, on May 20, 2026: At the time of my application, 090918 was the only digital-image related number that I could find. I agree that it's not the best fit for phone and desktop wallpaper, and 090696, for digital image files, is the best fit. Please grant my trademark under that category. The examining attorney indicated: This proposed amendment is beyond the scope of the original identification because the wording "090696 downloadable image files" is both indefinite, in that it is unclear what is meant by the numbers 090696, and also broader than "downloadable digital image files of works of art authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)." In other words, the applied-for goods, being "downloadable digital imagefiles of works of art authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)," are downloadable image files which are both works of art and also authenticated by NFTs, while "090696 downloadable image files" are neither specified to be works of art nor are they specified as being authenticated by NFTs. I find it implausible that the examining attorney does not know that this number 090696 comes from the Trademark ID manual. I am selling digital files, but they are not authenticated by NFTs. This is the same class of items, 9, it is just that they are not authenticated by NFTs. It is not outside of the scope to make a correction within the same trademark class, especially since the original issue was that the files I am selling are not NFT authenticated. Thank you, Kyeann Sayer/digitally signedACTIVEAug 21, 2025

Prosecution history

DateCodeEvent
Aug 25, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 25, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Aug 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
May 22, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
May 22, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
May 22, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
May 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
Feb 20, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 1, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 1, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Related guidance