USPTO serial 99418837
VIRGINIA AI COUNCIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUFFIN, GRACE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: December 1, 2026
Need help with VIRGINIA AI COUNCIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Office Action issues
The examiner has refused registration of your trademark because it is considered primarily geographically descriptive of where your services originate. To overcome this, the mark must have acquired distinctiveness or be well-known for something other than a geographical location.
Owner
Pearland, TX, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing recognition and incentives by the way of awards to demonstrate excellence in the field of professional and personal development in the artificial intelligence industry.; Educational services, namely, conducting live and on-line classes, seminars, conferences, workshops in the fields of professional and personal development in the artificial intelligence industry and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; Arranging and conducting of training workshops in the field of professional and personal development in the artificial intelligence industry.; Providing training for certification in the field of personal and professional development in the artificial intelligence industry.; Arranging and conducting of conferences, congresses and symposiums in the field of artificial intelligence. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |