USPTO serial 99423438
GPTMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GPTMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Albuquerque, NM, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kameron W. Kramer
Kameron W. Kramer LAW 4 SMALL BUSINESS OF TEXAS, PLLC1846 N Loop 1604 WSuite 205San Antonio, TX 78248Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software using machine learning for organizing emails; Downloadable software using machine learning for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails; Downloadable software using machine learning for organizing email boxes; Downloadable software using machine learning for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails utilizing Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT); Downloadable software using machine learning for organizing emails utilizing Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT); Downloadable software using machine learning for scheduling and delegating; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for organizing emails; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for organizing email boxes; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for scheduling and delegating | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2022 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for organizing emails; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for organizing email boxes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails utilizing Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for organizing emails utilizing Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for scheduling and delegating; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for organizing emails; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for organizing email boxes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for scheduling and delegating | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |