Drawing for GPTMAIL.COM

USPTO serial 99423450

GPTMAIL.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GPTMAIL.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kameron W. Kramer

Kameron W. Kramer LAW 4 SMALL BUSINESS OF TEXAS, PLLC1846 N Loop 1604 WSuite 205San Antonio, TX 78248

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for organizing emails; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for organizing email boxes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails utilizing Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for organizing emails utilizing Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using machine learning for scheduling and delegating; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for drafting, summarizing, and replying to emails; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for organizing emails; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for organizing email boxes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for scheduling and delegatingACTIVEJun 30, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
May 26, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance