USPTO serial 99423507
APEX INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALES, HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APEX INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for engineering services; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning, and database management, for use in physical machinery building, design, and development; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning, and database management, for use in building, design, and development of macro-mechanical systems; the foregoing will not be used with autonomous vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, development, design and upgrading of computer programs; Providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for engineering services; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning, and database management, for use in physical machinery building, design, and development; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning, and database management, for use in macro-mechanical system building, design, and development; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for automating physical machinery building, design, and development; the foregoing will not be used with autonomous vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |