USPTO serial 99423746
DATACURVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERTHELSEN, JONAH REVNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATACURVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ALTOS, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Russell
John E. Russell Allmark Trademark101 Parkshore DriveSuite 100Folsom, CA 95630Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the field of data analytics; Business consulting services in the field of customer relationship management; Business consulting services in the field of marketing; Business data analysis; Analysis of business data | ACTIVE | Sep 13, 2024 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for collecting, analyzing and organizing data in the field of deep learning; Providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for implementing multi-agent systems comprised of multiple interacting intelligent agents; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for data analysis; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for customer relationship management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for business and user analytics; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for marketing automation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for business and user analytics | ACTIVE | Sep 13, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |