USPTO serial 99425649
BLAZE AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONEN-CLARK, HOPE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLAZE AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA, US
Alpharetta, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK LAWRENCE SEIGEL
MARK LAWRENCE SEIGEL THE SEIGEL LAW FIRM730 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 600ATLANTA, GA 30308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for monitoring digital risks, detecting, analyzing, and mitigating cybersecurity threats; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for data processing, security event correlation, automated incident response, and integration with enterprise security platforms; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for digital risk protection, fraud detection, incident investigation, vulnerability analysis, compliance monitoring, and cybersecurity analytics; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for monitoring digital risks, detecting, analyzing, and mitigating cybersecurity threats; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for data processing, security event correlation, automated incident response, and integration with enterprise security platforms; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for digital risk protection, fraud detection, incident investigation, vulnerability analysis, compliance monitoring, and cybersecurity analytics; Downloadable application programming interface (API) software for use in cybersecurity, risk assessment, compliance automation, digital forensics, and enterprise security integrations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2026 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |