USPTO serial 99426067
CPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORSCHELN, COLLEEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zakari A Kurtz
Zakari A Kurtz Sneaker Law Firm, PLLC928 Washington StreetBaldwin, NY 11510United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail variety stores; Retail store services featuring poker and casino toys; Retail store services featuring toys, and sports equipment; Online retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods; Retail store services featuring downloadable digital image files of trading cards authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Online retail store services featuring downloadable virtual clothing; On-line retail store services featuring trading cards and toys; On-line retail store services featuring downloadable digital image files of trading cards authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); On-line retail store services featuring trading cards authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) | PARTIALLY PAID | Feb 8, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |