USPTO serial 99426352
SMARTSTRATEGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONNERS,LAUREN G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTSTRATEGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christian Casabar
Christian Casabar Sinorica LLC dba Thoughts to Paper20251 Century Blvd Ste 140Germantown, MD 20874United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for centralized task management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for agentless asset discovery; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for smart asset tags; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for asset hierarchy; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for lifecycle management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for asset risk questionnaires; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for risk registry; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for risk scoring and prioritization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for risk and asset dashboards; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for connected visibility; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for asset and vulnerability convergence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for vulnerability grouping; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for remediation and tracking; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for compliance framework mapping; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for external threat assessment; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for AI policy validation and evidence collection; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for Cross Map to Multiple Frameworks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for asset and compliance convergence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for vendor and contract management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for contract lifecycle management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for contract and asset convergence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for vendor risk assessments; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for budget management and resource allocation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for context-driven program management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for configurable project templates; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking and managing KPIs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for strategy management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for data capability mapping; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for integrated risk model management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for centralized task management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for agentless asset discovery; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for smart asset tags; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for asset hierarchy; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for lifecycle management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for asset risk questionnaires; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for risk registry; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for risk scoring and prioritization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for risk and asset dashboards; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for connected visibility; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for asset and vulnerability convergence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for vulnerability grouping; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for remediation and tracking; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for compliance framework mapping; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for external threat assessment; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for AI policy validation and evidence collection; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for Cross Map to Multiple Frameworks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for asset and compliance convergence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for vendor and contract management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for contract lifecycle management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for contract and asset convergence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for vendor risk assessments; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for budget management and resource allocation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for context-driven program management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for configurable project templates; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for tracking and managing KPIs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for strategy management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for data capability mapping; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for integrated risk model management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |