USPTO serial 99427112
GLP-1 PROTOCOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLP-1 PROTOCOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Spross
Brian Spross Jones & Spross1605 Lakecliff Hills LaneAustin, TX 78732United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Nut-based snack foods; Meat-based snack foods; Cheese-based snack foods; Vegetable-based snack foods; Tofu-based snack food; Fruit-based snack food; Dehydrated fruit snacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal-based snack food; Rice-based snack food; Granola-based snack bars; Corn-based snack foods; Wheat-based snack foods; Flour-based snack foods; Chocolate-based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing a website featuring information regarding healthy living and lifestyle wellness; Providing a website featuring information and advice in the fields of diet, weight loss, diet planning and lifestyle wellness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 11, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |