Drawing for FLUID ASCENT

USPTO serial 99427337

FLUID ASCENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLUID ASCENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of data engineering, analytics, AI, and dashboard servicesACTIVENov 1, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2026HSCDHIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT—
Oct 14, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 23, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
May 14, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 3, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance