USPTO serial 99429105
M M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POMEROY-MURPHY, KAITLIN I
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for invoice management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for project management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for project management and scheduling; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in project management through tracking, managing and analyzing project labor, project time, project compliance, and task time estimates; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in managing payroll; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for recording time spent on certain tasks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for organizing, storing, and analyzing hyperlinks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for communicating between multiple users using the same service on the same platform; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for storing electronic documents; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating electronic timelines; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for social networking; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for sharing documents and files between users; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for team collaboration; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking user locations in real time; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking the location of mobile devices in real time; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for storing the locations of mobile devices; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for inventory management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing messages stored in users' inboxes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing users' project folders and providing helpful insights into project status, task prioritization, workflow organization, and document relationships; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, storing, and replaying videos; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for converting file types; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, storing, and replaying audio; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing alarm clocks and timed notifications; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for keeping track of trips between two location points; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing world clocks and times across various cities and countries around the world; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for counting various iterations, namely, counting scores in sports games, inventory quantities, elapsed time entries, and task completion totals | ACTIVE | May 12, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |