USPTO serial 99431129
EDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRUSSMAN, IAN GEORGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen Bryant Tripp
Karen Bryant Tripp KAREN B. TRIPP, ATTORNEY AT LAWP.O. Box 1301Houston, TX 77251-1301United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cell phone cases; Cell phone straps; Cell phone covers; Cell phone batteries; Cell phone backplates; Cell phone faceplates; Cell phone auxiliary cables; Head-clip cell phone holders; Cell phone battery chargers; PC tablet mounts; Tablet computer chargers; Covers for tablet computers; PC tablet stabilizers; Tablet monitors; Specialty holsters adapted for carrying personal electronic devices, namely, cell phones; Hands-free headsets for cell phones; Chargers for cell phones; Cell phone battery chargers for use in vehicles; Battery chargers for cell phones; Carrying cases, holders, protective cases and stands featuring power supply connectors, adaptors, speakers and battery charging devices, specially adapted for use with handheld digital electronic devices, namely, cell phones; Electric charging cables; Earbud cases; Protective cases for smartwatches; Cases adapted for holding smartwatches; Smartwatch bands; Protective covers for smartwatches | ACTIVE | Jan 30, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |