USPTO serial 99437571
EDGEFABRIC.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDGEFABRIC.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvine, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Morton
Jeffrey D. Morton Haynes and Boone, LLP2801 N Harwood Street, Suite 2300Dallas, TX 75201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and edge computing devices, namely, system-on-module boards, embedded controllers for edge computing, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and Internet of Things (IoT) applications, downloadable software development kits (SDK), network routers, gateway routers and switches, and electronic connectivity modules; downloadable computer firmware for operating, configuring, managing, and controlling edge computing, networking, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices; downloadable computer software for configuring and deploying artificial intelligence models on edge computing devices; downloadable computer software for managing and monitoring artificial intelligence workflows in edge and Internet of Things (IoT) environments; downloadable computer software for composing and deploying data processing pipelines; downloadable computer software for deploying artificial intelligence models | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of computer systems; consulting services relating to the installation of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for configuring and deploying artificial intelligence models and data processing pipelines; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for managing and monitoring artificial intelligence workflows in distributed edge and Internet of Things (IoT) environments; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for composing and deploying artificial intelligence workflows to hardware accelerators; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting of computer software platforms for monitoring and controlling edge devices, networks, and artificial intelligence systems; Technological consulting services in the technology fields of computer hardware, edge computing, Internet of Things, and artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |