USPTO serial 99442242
FINN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with FINN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shane G. Smith
Shane G. Smith McCormick Barstow LLP7647 N. Fresno St.P.O. Box 28912Fresno, CA 93729Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for the creation of narrative and graphic content for marketing and brand management purposes; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for scanning and prioritizing narrative and graphic content to facilitate the development of marketing communications and for brand management purposes; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting user preferences to suggest narrative and graphic content for marketing and brand management purposes; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting user preferences to suggest human writers, artists, and other individuals capable of providing a user’s requested creative services for marketing and brand management purposes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for the creation of narrative and graphic content for marketing and brand management purposes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for scanning and prioritizing narrative and graphic content to facilitate the development of marketing communications and for brand management purposes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting user preferences to suggest narrative and graphic content for marketing and brand management purposes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting user preferences to suggest human writers, artists, and other individuals capable of providing a user’s requested creative services for marketing and brand management purposes | ACTIVE | May 17, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |